Written by our founder, this article appears in the January/February 2010 issue of Inside Look Magazine
It’s hard to ignore.
Green is everywhere. Concerns over toxic environmental chemicals are constantly grabbing
headlines, but are you aware of how many of these chemicals are found in cosmetics? A cosmetic, by definition
is anything you put on your body. Many believe that today’s body care products are filled to the
brim with a toxic brew that just may cost you your health, or your life. Why all the alarm? One look at the statistics will
get even the most die hard toiletry junky to take pause. Before the average person leaves the house, they have already applied
100 to 200 synthetic chemicals to their body, and that’s before a splash of their favorite fragrance. Many of these
chemicals have been linked to serious health threats including cancer, infertility and birth defects. Even
worse, studies show that children, young adults, unborn children and nursing babies may be the most vulnerable. In
case you doubt the legitimacy of these claims, concerns are being raised by some pretty credible organizations like the World
Health Organization and the CDC for starters.
Not
surprisingly, the beauty industry disagrees. Keep in mind they’ve built a massive empire that relies
on synthetic chemicals that come in every shape, color, consistency and fruit-a-licious scent. They are one of the largest
and most profitable of all industries spending more on advertising alone than any other industry on earth. So, as one
might anticipate, when an industry rep from their leading trade association was questioned about the safety of today’s
cosmetics he said not only are they generally safe, they are the safest of all the products that the FDA regulates. Let’s
stop there for a moment. He did say “regulates”, didn’t he? If you're like most
of us, you assumed that cosmetics are scrutinized under the ever watchful eye of the FDA. Under the federal
Food, Drug and Cosmetic Act cosmetics are not subject to any pre-market approval. That would be none. In addition, companies
are not required to substantiate performance claims or conduct safety testing. Cosmetics simply must be "safe when
used as directed in the labeling or under usual customary conditions of use." Is that regulation?
When we look at the amount of revenue generated within this industry, has it proved prudent to handle them with such
a laissez-faire approach? A review of some facts should answer that.
In 2004 the European Union banned the use of all chemicals that are known or strongly
suspected of causing cancer, mutations, or birth defects in cosmetic or personal care formulations, the same
ingredients identified by the World Health Organization, the CDC and others as known or potential health threats. The
list is frightfully long, but some of the worst offenders are:
DEA a
hormone disruptor and carcinogen that also depletes the body of choline needed for fetal brain development. DEA can show up
alone in products or as a contaminant
like Cocamide DEA.
1,4-Dioxane a known carcinogen that can appear as a contaminant in products containing sodium laureth
sulfate and ingredients that include the terms "PEG," "-xynol," "ceteareth," "oleth"
and most other ethoxylated "eth" ingredients.
Formaldehyde
has a long list of adverse health effects, including immune-system toxicity, respiratory irritation and cancer in
humans. It’s found in baby bath soap, nail polish and hair dyes as a contaminant.
The term "fragrance" may mask phthalates, which act as endocrine disruptors and
may cause obesity, reproductive and developmental harm.
Lead
is one of the ingredients in many toothpastes. Lead acetate is found in some brands of men's hair dye.
It is a neurotoxin.
Mercury,
found in the preservative thimerosol, is used in some mascaras. It is a neurotoxin.
Nano-particles, which may penetrate the skin and damage
brain cells. Most problematic are zinc oxide and titanium dioxide nano-particles, used in sunscreens to make them transparent.
Parabens (methyl-, ethyl-, propyl-, butyl-, isobutyl-)
which have weak estrogenic effects are common preservatives that appear in a wide array of toiletries. A study found that
butyl paraben damaged sperm formation in the testes of mice, and a relative, sodium methylparaben, is banned in cosmetics
by the E.U. Parabens break down in the body into p-hydroxybenzoic acid, which has estrogenic activity in human breast-cancer
cell cultures.
Petroleum Distillates
are human carcinogens and appear on the label as "petroleum" or "liquid paraffin."
Triclosan, widely
used in soaps, toothpastes and deodorants, has been detected in breast milk and found to interfere with testosterone activity
in cells.
This list is only the tip
of the ice burg. Even more worrisome is the fact that we don't know the cumulative effects of these chemicals,
nor has the synergistic effects been studied. While the cosmetic industry does not deny the presence of
chemicals with a harmful profile, they claim the ingredients are present in such a small amount, the concerns are unwarranted.
It is unlikely they will acknowledge harmful effects any time soon.
So what can you do? When choosing personal care products stick to those containing natural ingredients.
We evolved along side these substances and consequently they do not possess the risks. Beware of
“green washing” as you’ll find many of the products that are labeled “natural or organic” actually
contain only one or two natural ingredients, or they are a natural base but the rest consists of the same old toxic brew.
A good rule of thumb, if you can’t pronounce an ingredient that appears on the label, don’t buy it.
Poison, even in tiny amounts, is poison you don't need.